Game HST Mafia 3 (mafia wins!)

Campaign
Help with Donations ~ Better than Ads :)
Ok. Reading through Dr. White's interaction with Wad, White's defense really sounds more like wifom than anything I'd expect of him in a normal play after all. I can see where you're coming from saying he's been "all over the place"

[vote lynch Dr. White]

cos when has a dr white vote ever been bad :iria
your defense has been noted :iria
now it's an informative lynch :iria
PITCHFORKS

No. I just didn't trust Wad. I still don't trust Wad.

roman has nothing against the SK

you heard it here first

Are you braindead? I did it to get my vote off of since and because at the time I didn't want to vote Dr. White because Wad was the first person to really pressure him and I don't trust Wad.

@Roman thoughts on myself, mr. waffles and Nighty?

Mr. Waffles is :drake

Really don't have much of an opinion of him yet as I haven't seen him contribute a great deal to this game. Sort of unusual for him but this is D1 and there's more pressing targets.

Nighty is :ufdup

Claiming it's scummy of me to put a random vote just to get my vote off of Sin knowing I previously unvoted. I did that because like I said, my unvote was pointless apparently and wasn't counted. I didn't want to vote White at the time because Wad was the main one pressuring him. It had less to do with me not liking White's gib and more to do with me not trusting Wad.

You're :thunk

You're doing a good job of blending tbh, so good that you're a 50/50 to me.
 
read Platnium's passives and who his vote is on atm...
I guess you missed the part where I don't give a darn about your vote power...You are still openly a "vote for me" which will have influence outside of your actual power, and is completely unsubstantiated outside of "you've been arguing with Sin!" while not saying shit about sin, or his abyssmal performance.
 
I guess you missed the part where I don't give a darn about your vote power...You are still openly a "vote for me" which will have influence outside of your actual power, and is completely unsubstantiated outside of "you've been arguing with Sin!" while not saying shit about sin, or his abyssmal performance.
You think my vote is on you solely for sin? It is more to it than that. I don't like how you are treating people on your wagon in general.
He doesn't care that your vote doesn't count. :maybe
Oh he has made that clear
 
You think my vote is on you solely for sin? It is more to it than that. I don't like how you are treating people on your wagon in general.

/QUOTE]
So fucking say that. Who have I treated badly? Sin? Who i've been arguing with all day before the wagon? WAD? Who i've sussed and is the main proponent behind it? Who else have I treated badly? Shitty logic is shitty.
 
Ok. Reading through Dr. White's interaction with Wad, White's defense really sounds more like wifom than anything I'd expect of him in a normal play after all. I can see where you're coming from saying he's been "all over the place"

[vote lynch Dr. White]



No. I just didn't trust Wad. I still don't trust Wad.



Are you braindead? I did it to get my vote off of since and because at the time I didn't want to vote Dr. White because Wad was the first person to really pressure him and I don't trust Wad.



Mr. Waffles is :drake

Really don't have much of an opinion of him yet as I haven't seen him contribute a great deal to this game. Sort of unusual for him but this is D1 and there's more pressing targets.

Nighty is :ufdup

Claiming it's scummy of me to put a random vote just to get my vote off of Sin knowing I previously unvoted. I did that because like I said, my unvote was pointless apparently and wasn't counted. I didn't want to vote White at the time because Wad was the main one pressuring him. It had less to do with me not liking White's gib and more to do with me not trusting Wad.

You're :thunk

You're doing a good job of blending tbh, so good that you're a 50/50 to me.
I don't think this really helps my concerns with you I think it actually concerns me more. I don't like the Waffles or the nighty part even if I don't know where I stand on them myself.
 
I don't think this really helps my concerns with you I think it actually concerns me more. I don't like the Waffles or the nighty part even if I don't know where I stand on them myself.
Waffles got a slick comment back because he gave me one to his post. I haven't even beefed with nighty?

Another one to watch after I die, as I stated earlier. Bullshit logic is bullshit.
 
which is a bullshit ass excuse instead of looking at internal logic of post. So get fucked when I flip town for playing like shit.
You didn't get what I am saying. I am saying your past approach is not appealing so maybe try a diffrent one if you want to convince me.
Nfc was talking about Roman's reads.

:drake

American education.
also this
 
Implying I don't have other stuff to do, like actually work.

Does your limited brain capacity not allow you to think about anyone but yourself? Sorry to break it to you honey, but the world's not about you and it never will be.
Is that why you were viewing for so long and just responded now with one sentence?

Your second sentence doesn't even make sense :lmao but what am I expecting from you :cat
 
To be fair the superkill call was not a premeditated call and can be obviously ignored.
Can you blame a guy for asking a shot on W after his gimmicks sent all of us speculating for 15 pages?
Anything can be ignored, doesn't change the intent of the post being made.

Yeah I can. Immediately claiming miller is optimal play if you're self-aware. The unlynchable part is sketchier yet why would you blame WAD for your own choice to keep talking about the same issue for 15 pages? You chose to do that, he didn't force you to.

This game is a lot easier when you think about motives first. WAD's motive in Nello's game was obvious : force town to actually scumhunt his teammates by sacrificing himself to kill the cop. Here what is his motive? How would it benefit him more than if he doesn't make any claim? There are factors that we can't fully take into account because we don't know all the roles, at this point the best motive I can think of is if he has a bomb/duelist type role and wants to off the town vig, which I highly doubt. Vigs can easily be more detrimental to town than helpful. WAD is an ability magnet period so pulling this isn't really necessary.

Rather calm reply by you Stelios:hm
 
Anything can be ignored, doesn't change the intent of the post being made.

Yeah I can. Immediately claiming miller is optimal play if you're self-aware. The unlynchable part is sketchier yet why would you blame WAD for your own choice to keep talking about the same issue for 15 pages? You chose to do that, he didn't force you to.

This game is a lot easier when you think about motives first. WAD's motive in Nello's game was obvious : force town to actually scumhunt his teammates by sacrificing himself to kill the cop. Here what is his motive? How would it benefit him more than if he doesn't make any claim? There are factors that we can't fully take into account because we don't know all the roles, at this point the best motive I can think of is if he has a bomb/duelist type role and wants to off the town vig, which I highly doubt. Vigs can easily be more detrimental to town than helpful. WAD is an ability magnet period so pulling this isn't really necessary.

Rather calm reply by you Stelios:hm


I didn't talk about 15 pages , all of us collectively did. As for his motives I already questioned them and judging by your previous post you read them already. As for the calm part why wouldn't I be? I found your post sensible.
 
Let's assess all possible scenarios that his claim tell us:

miller:
that's like saying don't scan me because I will scan guilty. If you do I will be guilty anyway

unlynchable:
you can't lynch me but when i write this towns that gonna town will want to lynch me.

I have a power shot:

I am mexican god level 3



Wad can't be lying for everything.
It's possible that he is conveniently lying.
What does he want to achieve?

For sure he wants to get lynched and has claimed that he is guilty.

Why does he want to get lynched?

he wins the game or
he is unlynchable has town lose a day

Who demonstrates such behavior?

anti-town or indie

no other way

My opinion is still not different from this.

7. This game includes bastard mechanics. The moderator will lie to you.

also this. Plus Shizune actually wrote first that this game includes death millers then changed it into this line above.
I actually believe the last part that the moderator will lie and wad is a well known rule exploiter.
 
Yeah, I was gonna consider going after a different target but the inactivity this game is not worth it, so I'm just gonna bank on Dr. White being scum. And maybe I might end up eating crow for suspecting him on false flags but the way he treated his defense with his shitty attitude towards virtually everyone and his resignation to the lynch (with another 24 hours left in the game at the time) has pretty much sealed his fate.

Also, WPK has pretty much hit the nail on the head with that one post, the one thing I wanted to isolate though was Dr. White stressing the existence of death millers which to me signaled a will to induce paranoia in town.
 
Yeah, I was gonna consider going after a different target but the inactivity this game is not worth it, so I'm just gonna bank on Dr. White being scum. And maybe I might end up eating crow for suspecting him on false flags but the way he treated his defense with his shitty attitude towards virtually everyone and his resignation to the lynch (with another 24 hours left in the game at the time) has pretty much sealed his fate.

Also, WPK has pretty much hit the nail on the head with that one post, the one thing I wanted to isolate though was Dr. White stressing the existence of death millers which to me signaled a will to induce paranoia in town.
Enjoy your you know what.
 
I mean, if I end up being wrong. I was wrong.

I'll take most of the blame for it but if you think you had no fault with being unable to defend yourself (even now, where is your claim?) then :catshrug
You mean a bunch of people not stating their logic (outside of wpk) and following your wagon? I did defend myself, I was drunk so it was coarse, but lets not act like I didn't defend myself.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top