Game Warcraft III: The Scourge of Lordaeron (Alliance wins!)

Campaign
Help with Donations ~ Better than Ads :)
Unwatch
Nello said:
Seems to me like it's a faction ability so I assumed there would be a writeup by the host to publish the result. Or do one of you six have to come out with it? :hm
Click to expand...

I imagine the way it works is:

-Someone calls for the meeting (there's nothing in my role that suggests I could start it, so it might be unique to Antonidas and maybe a few others).

-We vote. The person who calls for it suggests our target itself. I may nominate another target or confirm the nominated target. I decided to confirm the nominated target.

-The investigation happens at night. I imagine it can't be stopped, only possibly tampered with.

-The six receive our results at the end of night.

I imagine the purpose of this mechanic is to ensure town always has an investigation unless all six of us manage to get genocide'd, or something.
 
Superman said:
It is not a reach to lynch wad day 1. How is it a reach? Do people really need to be fucked by wad multiple times before they start even getting remotely suspicious of him...everytime?



Town is used to their herders...
Click to expand...

Nello said:
There's plenty of blenders I want to lynch before WAD but don't trust him for shit unless there's solid evidence to suggest he's town
Click to expand...

How is there not solid evidence that I'm town now? lmao
 
Nello said:
I know the council of six are good. I know that most likely WAD is a good guy and not some dude who infiltrated the council but those silly humans have been infiltrated before
Click to expand...
I mean traitors are possible :hm with how we can't trust anything even Nitty and that's definitely something WAD would be capable of, but it's more risk than reward :hm

Frankly that action was as good as any to give him decent credibility. It isn't 100% but it's good enough to not want him dead right now.
 
Nitty Scott said:
You mean your haters?
Click to expand...

5ML7O.gif
 
SinRaven said:
Especially because if we truly want him 100% confirmed than we possibly need more council members to out themselves or someone else who investigated him to step forward which is a lot of waste
Click to expand...
And who has proposed this idea except for you? :lbj
WADsworth the Wise said:
It would also hurt me, because it means that I'll be priority #1 for scum.

Granted, this archmage has some tricks to make sure my death won't happen too fast, but yeah. :jackal
Click to expand...
Aren't you already top priority?
 
Nello said:
And who has proposed this idea except for you? :lbj

Aren't you already top priority?
Click to expand...

I don't know? I would imagine there's other roles like Uther, Arthas, Sylvanas, etc. that are currently Alliance-aligned but who knows with possible conversion mechanics that they might want to hunt after.

But yeah, seeing how desperate and frantic some people have been in trying to get rid of me already...having me be effectively confirmed is probably really dangerous for scum. So we shall see.
 
SinRaven said:
How else would you 100% confirm someone

Well yeah that one idea you had but that is flawed considering WAD doesn't control what part of the abilities Nitty decides to use in his write-up


You would know
Click to expand...
Well if the plan is flawed then we don't do it. It was worth asking though, wasn't it? If the plan had worked he would've been confirmed which would've helped us. I don't understand what your issue is here? You're being very suspicious to me right now
 
WADsworth the Wise said:
I don't know? I would imagine there's other roles like Uther, Arthas, Sylvanas, etc. that are currently Alliance-aligned but who knows with possible conversion mechanics that they might want to hunt after.

But yeah, seeing how desperate and frantic some people have been in trying to get rid of me already...having me be effectively confirmed is probably really dangerous for scum. So we shall see.
Click to expand...
Top priority as far as culling known townies goes. I can't speak for any role mechanics and such
 
SinRaven said:
You act like you're contributing but meanwhile your actions aren't actually that helpful to town
Click to expand...
Do you want to compare helpfulness? :skully

:skully
Evil C.C. said:
>Kaelthas
>Kel'Thuzad

Being part of the council of six or wahtever though doesn't clear you in any possible way as several of their people were bastards which deflected for the Burning Legion or being fucking Kel'Thuzad though what if you are just one of those bastard roles :hm
Click to expand...
Now THIS is interesting news :hm
 
WADsworth the Wise said:
fair enough, it doesnt clear me

still, i have provided far more evidence to my possible towniness than anyone here by a long shot

so if you lynch me, you're kinda dumb

exhibit a: stelios, the dumbest mafia player in the community
Click to expand...


That's called an ad hominem fam. Your lynch is also information lynch so that's about it. Notice how Franky conveniently sused you when I said about wanting to lynch you.

If you flip town , franky is most likely scum

now suck my balls
fukboy
 
Nello said:
Do you want to compare helpfulness?
Click to expand...
I never claimed I was helpful but I'm not faking to be helpful either.

Your discussion with Waffles, your concerns about WAD.. I asked you for a lead, you counter with asking me what I think about Vasto and when I ask you what YOU think of Vasto you don't answer.

You claim to be contributive and are trying to make it seem like you are helpful, but in actuality you're not doing anything other than just hiding in plain sight.
 
SinRaven said:
I never claimed I was helpful but I'm not faking to be helpful either.

Your discussion with Waffles, your concerns about WAD.. I asked you for a lead, you counter with asking me what I think about Vasto and when I ask you what YOU think of Vasto you don't answer.

You claim to be contributive and are trying to make it seem like you are helpful, but in actuality you're not doing anything other than just hiding in plain sight.
Click to expand...
Sin I have nothing personally against you, I think you're a great guy, but this makes no sense whatsoever

You asked for a lead so I suggested you investigate Supes or at least share your thoughts on him. You didn't follow up on that so clearly you weren't really looking for a lead to investigate. My scum bells are cracking from all this ringing

And this is particularly hypocritical: I asked you what you think about Supes but then you refuse to answer and instead ask ME what I think about him and then criticize me because I didn't answer :skully What in the actual chucklefudge :skully
 
Nello said:
Sin I have nothing personally against you, I think you're a great guy, but this makes no sense whatsoever

You asked for a lead so I suggested you investigate Supes or at least share your thoughts on him. You didn't follow up on that so clearly you weren't really looking for a lead to investigate. My scum bells are cracking from all this ringing

And this is particularly hypocritical: I asked you what you think about Supes but then you refuse to answer and instead ask ME what I think about him and then criticize me because I didn't answer :skully What in the actual chucklefudge :skully
Click to expand...
No you're wrong it's not hypocritical, because I know I haven't been contributive and I'm not acting like it either. You however act like you want everyone to be super contributive and act like you yourself are too, but everything you've done is fairly useless.

You bring up Vasto, someone I have nothing on (which I even said) and when I ask why you brought specifically him up you ignore me. To paraphrase your thoughts there 'oh sin seems to be on my back let's give him a throwaway scumread without giving any thought to it'

My obvious lead this entire time has been you yet you act like I'm not even suspecting you and yet still throw in an OMGUS with your reasoning for me being nothing more than 'you're acting weird', even though I'm COMPLETELY making sense.
 
SinRaven said:
No you're wrong it's not hypocritical, because I know I haven't been contributive and I'm not acting like it either. You however act like you want everyone to be super contributive and act like you yourself are too, but everything you've done is fairly useless.

You bring up Vasto, someone I have nothing on (which I even said) and when I ask why you brought specifically him up you ignore me. To paraphrase your thoughts there 'oh sin seems to be on my back let's give him a throwaway scumread without giving any thought to it'

My obvious lead this entire time has been you yet you act like I'm not even suspecting you and yet still throw in an OMGUS with your reasoning for me being nothing more than 'you're acting weird', even though I'm COMPLETELY making sense.
Click to expand...
You said
SinRaven said:
Idk what do you think about supes
Click to expand...
That's not nearly the same as saying "I honestly don't have anything on him". You clearly had a defiant tone, accusing me of being scum, so naturally I interpreted your post as "i'm not saying shit, i'm asking the questions here". Don't even try to mental gymnastics your way out of this. The reason I brought up Vasto was to gauge your reaction and surprise surprise you're not interested because he's not me. You said you wanted to hunt scum instead of wasting our time on WAD, yet you don't seem interested in anyone but me. You're not being a very good townie by accusing me of tunneling on WAD and then tunneling yourself.

And when/how did I act like you're not suspecting me? I never said "i'm town and you're stupid for suspecting me". Prove me wrong :ufdup
 
Shizune

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 1, guests: 0)
Back
Top